To cite this article:
Batechko, N. (2017). Quality management in higher education sphere: methodological aspect. Osvitolohiya6, 156-162, doi: 10.28925/2226-3012.2017.6.156162

To link to this article:
https://doi.org/10.28925/2226-3012.2017.6.156162

Batechko Nina,
ORCID iD 0000-0002-3772-4489

Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of Scientific-Research Laboratory of Educology, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University, 13-b Tymoshenko Str., 04212 Kyiv, Ukraine,  Ця електронна адреса захищена від спам-ботів. вам потрібно увімкнути JavaScript, щоб побачити її.

QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION SPHERE: METHODOLOGICAL ASPECT 

In the article the problem of education quality management was considered in the context of general scientific methodology. The modern tendencies of implementation of higher education quality and quality management in particular, were highlighted. It is shown that the practice of implementation of quality management systems, such as the Total Quality Management, positively affects the organizational, market and financial strategies for the formation of long-term competitive advantages in higher education sphere.

The modern interpretation of the essence and basic principles of education quality management was revealed. The methodological substantiation of the phenomenon of education quality management in the context of general scientific approaches was carried out: systemic, synergistic and acmeological. Such an approach makes it possible to substantiate the quality management as a complex, open system characterized by nonlinearity of transformations, allows to predict its development, proceeding from the development of each individual to the whole system as a whole.

It is proved that methodological substantiation of quality management on the basis of general scientific approaches can become the foundation on the basis of which the national system of education quality assurance will develop its own model, inherent only to it, taking into account the system of public administration in the field of Ukraine’s higher education, educational policy, academic traditions.

Key words: higher education;  quality of education;  quality of higher education;   education quality management;  principles of education quality management.

         

References

Viktorov, V. H. (2006). Rehuliuvannia yakosti osvity yak filosofsko-osvitianska problema [Regulation of the quality of education as a philosophical and educational problem](Doctoral dissertation, Kyiv, Ukraine) (ukr).
Volkov, O. I. (2006). Systemy yakosti vyshchykh navchalnykh zakladiv: teoriia i praktyka [Systems of quality of higher education: theory and practice]. Kyiv, Ukraine: Naukova dumka (ukr).
Dzhordzh, S., & Vaimerskyrkh, A. (2002). TQMVseobshchee upravlenye kachestvom. [TQM GeneralQuality Management]. Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation: Victory, 16–24 (rus).
Korotkov, E. Kontseptsiia yakosti osvity[Concept of quality of education]. Retrieved from  http://osvita.ua/school/manage/1342 (ukr).
Korsak, O. (2017). Svitovyi trend z vymiriuvannia yakosti serednoi i vyshchoi osvity: zarubizhnyi i natsionalnyi dosvid [World Trend for measuring the quality of secondary and higher education: foreign and national experience]. Vyshcha shkola4, 73–82 (ukr).
Kremen, V. H. (2014). Problema yakosti ukrainskoi osvity v konteksti suchasnykh tsyvilizatsiinykh zmin [The problem of the quality of Ukrainian education in the context of modern civilizational changes]. Profesiino-tekhnichna osvita, 4, 5–8 (ukr).
Kurdyumov, S. P., & Malynetskyi, T. H. (1996). Novoye v synergetike. Zahadki mira  neravnovesnykh struktur[New in synergy. Mysteries of the world of nonequilibrium structures]. Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation: Nauka (rus).
Lapidus, V. (2003). Vseobshcheye upravleniye kachestvom(TQM)[Universal Quality Management](TQM). Moscow, Russian Federation: Vysshaya shkola, 51–56 (rus).
Lisova, S. V. (2015). Problema zabezpechennia yakosti vyshchoi osvity z pozytsii systemnoho pidkhodu [The problem of ensuring the quality of higher education from the point of view of the system approach]. Profesiino pedahohichna osvita: systemni doslidzhennia: monohrafiia. Zhytomyr, Ukraine: Vyd-vo ZhDU im. I. Franka, 160–172 (ukr).
Lukina, T. (2008). Yakist osvity [Quality of education]. Entsyklopediia osvity [Entsyklopediia osvity]. Kyiv, Ukraine: Yurinkom Inter, 1017–1018 (ukr).
Natsionalna Doktryna rozvytku osvity [National Doctrine of Education Development] (2002). Kyiv, Ukraine: Shkilnyi svit (ukr).
Sysoieva, S. O., & Sokolova, I. V. (2016). Teoriia i praktyka vyshchoi osvity: navch. posibnyk [Theory and Practice of Higher Education: Teach. manual]. Kyiv, Ukraine: KU im. Borysa Grinchenka (ukr).
Sysoieva, S. O., & Sokolova, I. V. (2010). Problemy neperervnoi profesiinoi osvity: tezaurus naukovoho doslidzhennia: nauk. vydannia [Problems of Continuing Professional Education: Thesaurus of Scientific Research: Sciences. edition.]. Kyiv, Ukraine: Vydavnychyi dim «EKMO», 362 (ukr).
Sokolova, I. V. (2008). Profesiina pidhotovka maibutnoho vchytelia filoloha za dvoma spetsialnostiamy [Professional training of a future teacher of a philologist in two specialties].Mariupol, Ukraine: ART PRES, 400 (ukr).

      
Full Text: PDF (ukr.)